Hi cả nhà, tôi có tổng hợp và dịch một số thông tin cóp nhặt của thành viên xóm ta và bên ngoài như dưới đây. Tôi không phải dân chuyên môn, chỉ có kỹ năng đọc hiểu tốt 1 chút thôi nên má nào hiểu nhạc, check và confirm thông tin và post comment lên youtube dùm tôi nhé!
Còn các má nào muốn đứng lên bảo vệ sự thật và thằng Tùng trên diễn đàn youtube nữa mà lười dịch, post lên tôi dịch cho :) Tôi cũng lười nhưng chỉ dịch thôi thì không có vấn đề gì.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ok, guys, let’s do some clarification here.
First, the rhythm and chords arrangement of these two songs are too similar? Well, basically, rhythm and chords cannot be copyrighted neither. It’s a fact for a reason. Taking Jazz as an example, many songs are structured following exact arrangement of chords. Or occasionally, there are rap songs with exact same chords. Or think about hundreds of artist has been sampling the Funky Drummer – Stubblefield and why he couldn’t claim for unique recorded sample! No rhythm or chord progression gives a particular melody and vice versa. Check out what I am talking about? http://au.complex.com/music/2013/01/57-songs-that-sound-the-same/
Second, you think rap part of this song is stolen from Rap monster of BTS in Fire? Words are totally different, and yes, the flows are similar. But, guys, there is no such “flow plagiarism” if you don’t know. Rap flow is just rhythmic structures developed by rappers when they drop and splitting a bar. Borrowing flow is actually an old tradition among rappers. All rappers, famous or not, share some certain styles of flow. But only outstanding ones make some flows their signature trademarks thanks to their music popularity rather than the originality. Ironically, Rap mMnster was accused of plagiarizing in both flow and partly words from Kendrick Lamar by netizen, but back to the first fact you can’t actually plagiarize flow just like you can’t do that with same rhythm in songs.
Ok, so the only thing you can use in identifying a plagiarized song is its melody and lyrics. And this is not the case for CTKTVN and WDTA, here is the Vietnamese artist playing his original songs in piano? {link?} Does it sound similar? Definitely NO.
Charlie Puth will take action if he sees any violation of his work which I doubt he will ever do. As audience, just enjoy bloody music and leave both boys alone.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


As a Vietnamese, I think I need to give some inside for more factual based judgment, not just biased hatred or fanatic craze. I believe that all accusations here are made by anti-fans, so please do your own analysing before coming to conclusion who copy whom. No one steals anything, everybody borrows.
Son Tung, truly has been involving in many suspicions of plagiarism, almost all of his works, in which there was only one song “Chac ai do se ve” brought up as a case, but was dismissed due to not having enough evidence and the confirmation of “no such plagiarism” from the representative of so-called-original Korean composer Yong Hwa of “Because I miss you”. So, all the accusations of plagiarism, so far, have been brought up mainly his haters, competitors or money-driven tabloids. It’s a fact, in Vietnam, for the time-being if not the time-ever-been, Son Tung MTP is the most controversial star, being torn by the extremeness of hate and love, every move of his becomes the centre of gossiping. I guess everyone wants a bite of him :)
For this particular case of “Chung ta khong thuoc ve nhau” and “We don’t talk anymore” in my opinion, there is similarity in chord progression, however the melody, lyrics and overall feeling are completely different. Theoretically, this is such a simple old-school technique in composing songs. After centuries of chord progression development, who can claim originality of any of his work?! .